Enabling Reasoning with LegalRuleML
نویسندگان
چکیده
In order to automate verification process, regulatory rules written in natural language needs to be translated into a format that machines can understand. However, none of the existing formalisms can fully represent the elements that appear in legal norms. For instance, most of these formalisms do not provide features to capture the behavior of deontic effects, which is an important aspect in automated compliance checking. This paper presents an approach for transforming legal norms represented using LegalRuleML to a variant of Modal Defeasible Logic (and vice versa) such that legal statement represented using LegalRuleML can be transformed into a machine readable format that can be understand and reasoned about depending upon the client’s preferences. Note: This article is currently under consideration for publication in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).
منابع مشابه
LegalRuleML: Design Principles and Foundations
This tutorial presents the principles of the OASIS LegalRuleML applied to the legal domain and discuss why, how, and when LegalRuleML is wellsuited for modelling norms. To provide a framework of reference, we present a comprehensive list of requirements for devising rule interchange languages that capture the peculiarities of legal rule modelling in support of legal reasoning. The tutorial comp...
متن کاملBridging the gap between Legal Practitioners and Knowledge Engineers using semi-formal KR
The use of Structured English as a computation independent knowledge representation format for non-technical users in business rules representation has been proposed in OMG’s Semantics and Business Vocabulary Representation (SBVR). In the legal domain we face a similar problem. Formal representation languages, such as OASIS’ LegalRuleML and legal ontologies (LKIF, legal OWL2 ontologies etc.) su...
متن کاملLegal Interpretations in LegalRuleML
Legislative documents are by their own nature subject to interpretation, and interpretations of one document can diverge. In this paper we discuss the mechanism proposed by LegalRuleML to capture alternative interpretations or renderings of a legal source. LegalRuleML allows for mutually incompatible renderings (or interpretations) of a legal source to coexist in the same LegalRuleML document, ...
متن کاملLegalRuleML: XML-Based Rules and Norms
Legal texts are the foundational resource where to discover rules and norms that feed into different concrete (often XML-based) Web applications. Legislative documents provide general norms and specific procedural rules for eGovernment and eCommerce environments, while contracts specify the conditions of services and business rules (e.g. service level agreements for cloud computing), and judgme...
متن کاملCombining Ontology and Rules to Model Judicial Interpretation
This research aims to define an integrated methodology for modelling judgments, starting from legal texts and capturing not only structural parts but also arguments used by judges to reach conclusions. The goal is to build a complete ontology framework capable of detecting and modelling knowledge from the judgement’s text. The formalized judgements provide the necessary metadata for the rule la...
متن کامل